This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Italo Ghidoni Bruno Biagi Davide Pacini Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fortuna, D. Articles by Grilli, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fortuna, D. Articles by Grilli, R. Related Collections Cardiac - other

Assessing clinical performance in cardiac surgery. Does a specialised clinical database make a difference?

^a Department of Clinical Governance, Agenzia Sanitaria Regionale, Viale Aldo Moro, 21, 20147 Bologna, Italy
^b Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera, Parma, Italy
^c Department of Cardiac Surgery, Hesperia Hospital, Modena, Italy
^d Department of Cardiac Surgery, Villa Maria Cecilia, Lugo, Ravenna, Italy
^e Department of Cardiac Surgery, Azienda ospedaliera, Bologna, Italy
^f Department of Cardiac Surgery, Villa Salus, Reggio Emilia, Italy

*Corresponding author. Tel.: +39-051-6397450; fax: +39-051-6397053.

E-mail address: rgrilli{at}regione.emilia-romagna.it (R. Grilli).

We compared mortality rates league tables for six cardiac surgery centres developed using an administrative database (integrated with information on patients' EuroSCORE) with those drawn from a specialised clinical database. Data from 4017 patients undergoing cardiac surgery over the period January 1st–December 31st 2003, and identified both databases were used. Case mix adjusted in-hospital mortality rates were estimated relying on information provided by each database, and league tables were drawn from both. The correlation between the two league tables was assessed through the Spearman correlation coefficient. League tables drawn from the two sources identified the same ‘best’ and ‘worst’ centres and the Spearman correlation coefficient confirmed a high level of agreement between the two rankings (r=0.89; P<0.02). Use of the logistic EuroSCORE instead of the additive one did not change the results. An administrative and a clinical specialised database provided similar league tables. However, this finding by no means implies that clinical databases should be abandoned. While administrative data allow a more efficient performance assessment, clinical databases may more properly satisfy the legitimate demand of surgical staff of being directly involved in quality monitoring, rather than being mere passive objects of external assessment.

Key Words: Administrative data; Clinical database; Cardiac surgery; League table; Case-mix adjustment