ICVTS Click here for other ICVTS advertising opportunities
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2006;5:749-753. doi:10.1510/icvts.2006.136457
© 2006 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Kyriakos St. Rammos
George J. Koullias
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by St. Rammos, K.
Right arrow Articles by Argyrakis, N. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by St. Rammos, K.
Right arrow Articles by Argyrakis, N. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease
Right arrowRelated Article

Follow-up paper - Aortic and aneurysmal

The Nicks–Nunez posterior enlargement in the small aortic annulus: immediate–intermediate results{star}

Kyriakos St. Rammos*, Demetrios G. Ketikoglou, George J. Koullias, Sotirios G. Tsomkopoulos, Charalambos K. Rammos and Nikolaos P. Argyrakis

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece

*Corresponding author. 29 Karolou Diehl str, Thessaloniki 54623, Greece. Tel.: +30 2310 222.021; fax: +30 2310 222.021.

E-mail address: rammos{at}the.forthnet.gr (K. St. Rammos).

Objective: To avoid prosthesis–patient mismatch, posterior enlargement of the small aortic annulus using the Nicks–Nunez surgical approach was performed in fifteen patients and the immediate–intermediate results are reported retrospectively. Methods: During the period November 1995 to June 2005, 220 patients underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) for primary aortic stenosis (AS). Fifteen patients (15/220 – 6%), all women, 40–76 years old (mean age 65.8 years) with AS, underwent AVR applying the Nicks–Nunez posterior enlargement of the small aortic annulus with an effective aortic valve area 0.7±0.2 cm2. In addition, mitral valve replacement (MVR) was performed in two patients and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in three (2 grafts/pt). Endarterectomy of the ascending aorta was performed in one patient. With the exception of one patient, mechanical valves were used. In all cases, transesophageal echo (TEE), normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), left ventricular venting, antegrade crystalloid cardioplegic arrest and local myocardial cooling, was used. The defect after the enlargement was closed with autologous pericardium in four and synthetic graft in eleven patients. The follow-up period was 5–120 months (mean 61.5 months). Results: There was no operative or hospital mortality. The length of CPB and aortic crossclamping was increased as well as the duration of mechanical ventilation. In one, out of two patients, in whom the decision for enlargement was delayed, intraaortic balloon pump was used. However, there was no other morbidity and the final length of stay was 7–10 days (same as for routine AVR). One patient died five years later from lung cancer. Serial follow-up transthoracic echoes have shown statistically significant improvements in left ventricular–intraventricular septum thickness (LVIVS) (16.5±1.3 mm vs. 14.3±1.7 mm, P<0.01), left ventricular posterior wall thickness (LVPWT) (16.7±1.4 mm vs. 14.5±1.8 mm, P<0.01), left ventricular (LV) mass/g (415±33 vs. 388±41, P<0.01), peak gradient (98±10 mmHg vs. 48±7 mmHg, P<0.001) and in mean gradient (58±10 mmHg vs. 22±8 mmHg, P<0.001). The functional aortic valve orifice postoperatively was 1.4±0.5 cm2. The ejection fraction (EF) and the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) were unchanged. Conclusions: Immediate and intermediate results reveal the safety of the procedure and the significant functional and anatomical improvement of the left ventricle. Although the number of patients is small, female patients, small or large, seem to be the usual candidates for this procedure.

Key Words: Nicks–Nunez procedure; Small aortic root


Related Article

ICVTS on-line discussion A
Abbasali Karimi
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2006 5: 754. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICVTSHome page
A. Karimi
ICVTS on-line discussion A
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2006; 5(6): 754 - 754.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery