ICVTS Click here for other ICVTS advertising opportunities
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published on July 2, 2008
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2008, doi:10.1510/icvts.2008.178624
© 2008 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Journal Format PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eComments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gorlitzer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rand, T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gorlitzer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rand, T.

Aortic and aneurysmal (ICVTS only)

Translumbar treatment of type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

Michael Gorlitzer 1*, Gerard Mertikian 1, Hubert Trnka 1, Alexander Froeschl 1, Johann Meinhart 1, Gabriel Weiss 1, Martin Grabenwoeger 1, Thomas Rand 1

1 Hospital Hietzing, Vienna, Austria

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: michael.gorlitzer{at}wienkav.at.


   Abstract
The modality of treatment and the appropriate time point to treat type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR) remain controversial issues. The purpose of the present study was to assess the efficacy of translumbar embolization of type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm repair. Eighty-four consecutive patients after EVAR were analyzed for the onset of type II endoleaks. Of these, five patients had experienced translumbar embolization after ineffective intraartrial approach to exclude the endoleak. A combination of several liquid embolic agents was used as sealant. Post-procedural contrast enhancedultrasound (CEUS) was used to document the outcome of the embolization. Translumbar embolization was successful in 4 patients. Complete sealing of the nidus was seen on CEUS 24 h after the procedure. In one patient with a duplication of the inferior vena cava, the procedure was aborted because an additional type Ib endoleak was found. The procedure was well tolerated by all patients. The translumbar approach to treat growing aneurysm sacs in patients with persistent type II endoleaks is safe and well tolerated. The immediate post-interventional outcome as documented on CEUS is promising. Long-term follow-ups are yet to be performed. Keywords: Endovascular; Aortic aneurysm; Endoleak; Embolization





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery