ICVTS Click here for other ICVTS advertising opportunities
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published on November 2, 2009
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2009, doi:10.1510/icvts.2009.216275
© 2009 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Journal Format PDF)
Right arrow eComments: Submit
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eComments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lu, T.-L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Qanadli, S. D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lu, T.-L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Qanadli, S. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Great vessels

Vascular thoracic

Variability of ascending aorta diameter measurements as assessed with electrocardiography-gated multidetector computerized tomography and computer assisted diagnosis software

Tri-Linh Christian Lu 1*, Elena Rizzo 1, Pedro Manuel Marques-Vidal 1, Ludwig Karl von Segesser 1, Jamshid Dehmeshki 2, Salah Dine Qanadli 1

1 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
2 University of Kingston, London, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tluonmac{at}gmail.com.


   Abstract
Recently morphometric measurements of the ascending aorta have been done with ECG-gated multidetector computerized tomography (MDCT) to help the development of future novel transcatheter therapies (TCT); nevertheless, the variability of such measurements remains unknown. Thirty patients referred for ECG-gated CT thoracic angiography were evaluated. Continuous reformations of the ascending aorta, perpendicular to the centerline, were obtained automatically with a commercially available computer aided diagnosis (CAD). Then measurements of the maximal diameter were done with the CAD and manually by two observers (separately). Measurements were repeated one month later. The Bland-Altman method, Spearman coefficients, and a Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to evaluate the variability, the correlation, and the differences between observers. The interobserver variability for maximal diameter between the two observers was up to 1.2 mm with limits of agreement [-1.5, +0.9] mm; whereas the intraobserver limits were [-1.2, +1.0] mm for the first observer and [-0.8, +0.8] mm for the second observer. The intraobserver CAD variability was 0.8 mm. The correlation was good between observers and the CAD (0.980-0.986); however, significant differences do exist (p<0.001). The maximum variability observed was 1.2 mm and should be considered in reports of measurements of the ascending aorta. The CAD is as reproducible as an experienced reader. Keywords: ECG-gated computed tomography; Ascending aorta diameter; Interobserver variability; Intraobserver variability; Computer aided diagnosis; Centerline based segmentation software





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery